Frasier and Star Trek

I watch Netflix daily. I’ve been alternating between Mission Impossible (TOS) and Frasier. From about season one, I’ve noticed a common thread throughout the Frasier series: Star Trek.

I already commented about Rat Patrol, Star Trek (TOS) and Mission Impossible (TOS) using the same sets and the same actors. The Frasier/Star Trek thing isn’t as bad as that; in fact, it’s far more subtle.

Kelsey Grammer appeared in a Star Trek (TNG) episode as a starship captain. I’m not going to take the time to do an IMDB comparison, but the number of actors appearing on both shows has to be high. Every once in a while they throw in a Star Trek reference, but the episode I just saw was the clincher.

Patrick Stewart appeared in the episode as a well-placed high-society man who happened to be gay. He mistook Frasier as a gay man and hilarity ensued. For me, that pretty much confirmed the link. Nothing earth-shattering, but it will inspire me at some point to do the IMDB  check.

It was also funny to see Wendy Malick and Jane Leeves on the same show before Hot in Cleveland. Again, nothing to phone home about; just an observation.

Hunger Games

My son and I went to see Hunger Games today. Bottom Line: I enjoyed the movie although I was close to flat-lining it for a while. Watched from a movie theater of Twilight-loving teenage girls, I can see it has its place at the top of a new genre depicting young female action heroes.

I knew I was in trouble when the entire row of girls in front of us, seriously, all of them, started gushing from the very first moment something about Twilight came on in the previews. I have no idea what it was. It could have been the font used, the music, the topography, something. They knew what was happening before anyone else in the theater. The girl on the far left started talking about the movie coming out in December well before any recognizable character from the movie appeared on-screen. When the preview revealed the movie would release in November, the entire row of girls became giddy and overcome with emotion that Twilight was being released sooner than they thought. It was a very moving moment for them. And I should have known I was in trouble.

I will try hard not to ruin the movie, but I have two major complaints. If I recall correctly, the districts send to the capital tributes aged between 12 and 18. That’s a huge gap. Physically, emotionally and experience-wise, that’s huge. If I were in charge we’d narrow the age range down a bit, like 12-14, 14-16, 16-18. My thought is that just about any 18 year old will wipe the floor with any 12 year old. But that’s just me.

Second, if you can create something out of nothing (i.e. a hologram becoming real), why can it kill me but I can’t kill it? For example, if you create fish in a lake simply because your technology allows it, why can’t I catch and eat them? If you create a sheep in a field, how is it possible that sheep might attack and kill me but my weapons are seemingly harmless against it? That bothered me. Not so much the playing God part but the fact that the very weapons with which I can cut down trees, decimate competitors and a number of other “real” tasks have no impact on other creations.

The story centers on one girl’s challenges during the Hunger Games that I won’t get into except for how it relates to every teenage girl in the theater. This is a girl’s movie. It’s not a romantic “chick flick.” People die. Kids die. Kids kill kids. It is what it is. But you cannot escape this is a girl’s movie.

From the beginning, you see the beautiful young girl being strong, decisive and loving in an almost maternal role. She transitions to a strong, independent, skilled hunter as easily as walking out her front door. Then she’s a strong, independent, desirable young woman with some hunky buff dude putting the moves on her. We know the guy is hunky not because he reminds me a lot of myself at that age (okay, maybe not) but because every teenage girl in the theater let out some type of audible “oohh” or “ahhh” when he appeared on-screen.

So then the girl briefly becomes a victim of circumstance but then rises above to once again become the strong, independent young woman. Yadda, yadda, yadda and blah, blah, blah, she keeps the strong and independent mantle during the Games but is rotated through the maternal, hunter, desirable, victim persona throughout the movie.

At one point she’s helping another hunky dude with an issue. She gives him a kiss that the first hunky guy happens to see on TV. I kid you not, every girl in the theater moaned an “oowww” when that happened. They couldn’t have planned it better if they had scripted the Rocky Horror Picture Show audience participation manual. All of them, in unison, “oowww.” I think my son and I pissed off the girls in front of us because we really did laugh out loud.

So all the theater girls are rooting for the heroine and hunky guy number two. There is a hunky guy number three but he’s too much of an a-hole to let his looks give him a pass. We know this because the girl in front of me told the girl next to her that he was too much of a jerk for Katness (the heroine) to “hook-up with.” He didn’t get any “oohhs, ahhhs or oowwws” from any of the girls until near the end when they all cheered him.

The heroine does what she has to do and correctly starts thinking about what’s going to happen to her next. Then hunky guy number one re-appears on the scene. Once again, the theater erupted in a series of “oowwws” from all the girls. What’s Katness going to do? Then the movie ends. That by itself was awesome. It totally pissed off at least the row of girls in front of me. They had no closure and let it be known they were not happy with the ending.

I don’t know exactly what they were looking for, but it’s a movie. It’s a movie based on a book. If you didn’t like the book’s ending, did you think the movie’s would be different? If you didn’t like the movie’s ending, did you read the book? Don’t sit there and start talking crap about the movie you just spent all afternoon gushing over just to complain that it’s not fair you don’t know what happens to Katness next. Did you scream at the Twilight movies?

Anyway, I liked the movie. Again, no nudity and no swearing, so it’s okay for younger kids. Well, if you get past the whole kids-killing-kids premise. But even that was fairly sterile. Most of the death was implied rather than gruesomely displayed. If you see the movie and you’re not a 12-17 year old girl, you might really like it. If you’re a 12-17 year old girl, prepare to have your heart torn from you as you’re left wondering how Katness will end the movie. If you’re a 12-17 year old boy, don’t laugh at your date when she swoons over the hunky dudes.

Enjoy.

Conflicted

Today I face an ethical dilemma. It may not seem like much and you may think you have the “best” answer but like many things, it’s a personal problem I have to address and overcome. However, I would like your input.

I went to lunch at one of the finer dining establishments in my fair ville today. Okay, it was the Del Taco drive-through but it was still better than the batch of plain brown rice I’m making for dinner tonight. Anyway, allow me to start with a complaint: People.

I am not better than you. I do not for one second believe you exist to serve me and make my life comfortable and do my bidding. We all have daily trials as much as we have daily victories. If I can help you with a trial or walk with you through hardship, ask. I would love nothing more than to help you celebrate a victory, regardless of its size. We all need victories. But there are those among us that turn their trials or hardships into true tests of courage, patience and restraint for the rest of us. Yes, I’m talking about the people who can’t make up their minds at the fast-food drive-through order kiosk.

My kids have heard me say often enough, “It’s a McDonald’s. The menu didn’t change from when you were here two days ago.” Substitute your favorite fast-food establishment as appropriate and it still holds true. To be fair, some very popular regional restaurants with the drive-through option may be unknown to visitors. For example, here in Southern California’s Inland Empire we have a chain of restaurants called Farmer Boys. I would not expect a NASCAR-loving, beer-swilling, cigarette-smoking, country music-listening, drawl-speaking, Pro Rodeo-watching visitor from Alabama to know about Farmer Boys. For that matter, I was flabbergasted by the sheer volume of Bojangle’s restaurants (one on every corner) when I toured through the Carolinas a couple of years ago. Regional is regional. I get that. And stupid generalizations are stupid, but it helped paint a picture for you.

As far as I’m concerned, you go to a drive-through for speed as well as convenience. The spelling “thru”, to me by the way, conveys a unique sense of ignorance like writing “ok” when the word is spelled “okay”. But I digress. Since you’ve chosen the drive-through option, the issue of consistency has been established. You wouldn’t go to Subway looking for a bucket of chicken just like you wouldn’t go to KFC looking for a roast beef sandwich. You chose that restaurant’s drive-through because you know what they sell and you want it faster and in a more convenient manner than going inside.

Assuming you’ve never been to a Pup-N-Taco before, I have a high amount of confidence your first visit would not be through the drive-through. Even if you’ve heard great things about the place, you’ll want to take a minute to peruse the menu and make a selection from what “sounds” good or what you see others eating. The first-time interaction of seeing the menu, seeing the kitchen layout, getting an overall “feel” for the place and taking in the sounds and smells will establish a baseline from which you will later judge your subsequent drive-through experience. Again, I think the chances of you going to Pup-N-Taco your first time and ordering something at the drive-through kiosk simply because I said you might like it are slim.

Oh, but there are those who live to prove me wrong. In fact, I sat behind one today for quite some time. It’s a freaking Del Taco. Like Taco Bell, they serve pretend Mexican food. Nothing (except the salsa, maybe) is hand-made. It’s all processed, pre-packaged crap from somewhere else. In my mind it’s like a scene from The Simpson’s. They go to the county fair and all the different ethnic groups have food tents from which you can order their country’s specialty. All the orders are routed through one location and filled by someone dipping a ladle into a cauldron of something and pouring it into a bowl or plate. This is then placed on a tray and taken by conveyer belt back to the tent from which the order was placed. That pretty much describes fast-food drive-through restaurants in general: Generic slop from somewhere else presented to you at their window.

First-time visitor or someone looking for a change of pace, I don’t know. But the woman today did as much to delay the progress of mankind in general as possible. She could not decide. I could understand if she had kids in the car and wanted to keep everyone happy. It didn’t appear as though she did. I could also understand if she had multiple people in the car (like a church car pool or something) and everyone wanted something unique. She looked like she was alone. Alone and curious.

“What comes with a number five?” Well, let’s see. There’s a picture of it not three feet in front of you. It looks like it comes with a this, a that, and a thingamajig. “Oh, I don’t want that. What comes with a number six?” Well, here in Western society we often treat things in a linear, progressive manner. I’ll look either right next to or immediately below the number five and–oh, there it is, the elusive number six. Huh. The picture indicates it contains a whozit, a whatzit and a whachamacallit. “Okay, I’d like a number six but what comes on the whozit?”

I know the eight inch by eight inch picture does not have the finest detail in the world, but it looks like a burrito that contains ground beef, refried beans, cheese, a hot sauce of some type and a tortilla. “Instead of ground beef can I get chicken?” Why yes, you can. We call it the number eleven. “What comes with the number eleven?” A chicken whozit, a whatzit and a whachamacallit. “Oh, okay. Yes, I’d like the number eleven with chicken. And instead of the whachamacallit can I change it to a thingamajig?” Yes, you can do that.

But now you’re off the regularly numbered combination menu and into our entree menu items. If you substitute the whachamacallit for the thingamajig it’s thirty cents extra. “Okay, let’s do that. And can I get that with the really large drink?” Yes, but that will be an additional fifty-five cents. Your total is seven dollars and sixteen cents. Will that be all for you today or would you like to try a tooth-rotting straight sugar dessert? “No, that’s it. Thank–Oh, wait! Can I substitute my large drink for a shake?” And on it went until she finally nit-picked her order to get exactly what she wanted.

So, having had enough time to become fairly well acquainted with every detail of the backside of her vehicle, she pulled forward. She left the comfort of the drive-through kiosk and entered the frightening (yet aptly named) Realm of Reality: The left turn to the window.

I have a fairly hard and fast rule of driving any vehicle. To keep this rule means you have demonstrated the aptitude and higher-level thought processes required of a licensed driver. To violate this rule you must, at some point, be punished. The rule: If you can’t park it, you can’t drive it. No, she wasn’t trying to park her vehicle. She was trying to negotiate a single left turn so she could enter the straight-away in front of the payment window. But if you can’t do that simple task I guarantee you she could not parallel park that vehicle.

She was in a Cadillac SUV that clearly was too much for her. I don’t care about the make of car she drove. It could have been a 1970s-era Chevrolet Suburban or her 2012 Cadillac. The point is that the vehicle greatly exceeded her driving ability. Someone should have taken the keys away from her. Unlike Disneyland, the Realm of Reality does not allow for a center rail down the lane which takes control of your vehicle and keeps you pointed in the correct direction if you over- or under-steer. Unlike the go-cart track, you can’t just keep your foot on the gas, bumping off one curb to the other until the ride’s done. You have to actually participate in and learn from the driving experience.

No kidding, I’ve seen guys in trucks with trailers go through a drive-though without rubbing rubber on either the truck or the trailer. The woman today turned a simple left turn into a twelve-point back-and-forth event from which I was getting sick watching. The fact she was a woman had nothing to do with it. The fact that she did not have confidence and or experience in what she was doing is the bigger issue. I’ll bet she took her driving test in a small sub-compact car she borrowed from someone. There is no way she parallel-parked a vehicle the size of a Jawa Sandcrawler when she took her driver’s test.

But that’s not my issue today. That was a minor annoyance that did nothing but cause me to re-think my food choice and hope to be good later on. Today’s event happened at the window.

I pulled up and recognized the same voice from the squawk-box as belonging to the kid hanging out the window looking for payment. I handed him my credit card and he handed me my beverage. He disappeared for a moment and re-appeared with a straw before once again returning to his spider hole. A short while later another uniformed person appeared and handed me my lunch order. She wished me a good day and started to shut the window. I asked for if she had my credit card and she held it up, saying, “This one?”

Seriously, what would she have done if I said, “No, the other one?” I was the only one in line. Specifically, I was the only one at the window. Do they have a bunch of cards they’ve kept from other customers? Is there a little bucket of unclaimed ATM, debit and credit cards on the other side of the window I can’t see? What kind of question is that, “this one?” Anyway, I told her yes, that was the one.

Then she asked for my name. What? It didn’t matter one iota to them who I was when I handed them the card in the first place. I could have charged twenty five dollars worth of tacos and burritos and they would not have asked to see my identification, let alone asked my name. Assuming she was the new window HMFIC (Head Mother Flunkee In Charge), I told her my name. I was tempted to say Al Sharpton or Huey Lewis but I didn’t. I don’t think she would have seen the humor as much as I. With my name (luckily) matching what was written, the card was returned and I drove off.

Then it occurred to me that I never received a copy of my receipt. I would have expected it with the drink, but I received the drink concurrent with issuing the card. The next opportunity would have been when I was given the straw. But all I received was the straw. As I returned to my combination office / dungeon, I started thinking that I didn’t see the girl put a receipt in the bag. That started my first pangs of guilt: What if I hadn’t paid for my meal? Not wanting to dwell on it, I pushed it out of my mind until I sat at my desk.

There is no receipt anywhere in the bag. I never received one. So, did the first guy run my card and just forget to give me a receipt? I won’t know until Monday. I know the girl didn’t run my card.

I am not as happy as I might have been when I was younger, glad that I had a “free meal” because they screwed up. I have no idea what policy Del Taco has regarding “short” cash drawers at the drive-through. It really bothers me to think that some kid might get docked the cost of at least my meal because he got involved in something else and didn’t run my card. That one issue alone is my problem. Kid number one did what you would expect: He repeated my total and took my card. Kid number two did what you might expect: Saw a card on a ledge inside the store and returned it, perhaps assuming the card had already been run.

Am I going to go back to the store and have them “Z”-out a register so I can pay them and feel better? No. Am I going to take the money I would have paid them and buy lunch for someone else? Maybe, but that won’t relieve me of my concern. And no, I’m not going to give you the money and let you “take care of it” on my behalf.

Seriously, what would you do? I can’t just let this one go. Potentially there’s one, maybe two, high school students trying to make something of themselves on a Sunday afternoon who might have to pick up the cost of my lunch. I feel like I just did a dine-and-dash, only much worse. If I had intentionally deceived or defrauded them out of the cost of my lunch, I am totally responsible. If they had handed me my lunch and never asked for my card it doesn’t change the result: I know I should have paid but I didn’t even make an attempt. This is different.

I tried to pay. For all I know, I did pay and they just didn’t give me a receipt. I am certain some of you will tell me just to suck it up and enjoy the free food, but I’m interested in hearing from the more mature and responsible readers I know are out there. What would you do?

John Carter

Bottom Line: I enjoyed the John Carter movie. Now you don’t have to read this whole thing.

I don’t have a television or a radio. I use an iPad to stream NetFlix and my computer to stream either old time radio (here) or contemporary Christian radio (here). Once or twice a day I’ll visit news sites that include Drudge Report and World Net Daily. As an aside to this story, if you think Drudge is a tool of the right-wing bunker-builders, you haven’t actually been to the site. If you scroll down to the bottom of the page you can link directly to just about any media outlet you’d like. This includes “real” news outlets. Funny thing, what’s a “real” news outlet? I’ve had this discussion a few times with one of the contributors here. Apparently, World Net Daily doesn’t qualify as a “real” news agency. I’m still unclear as to what the delimiters are, but I like them and like their new online format. Regardless, I’ll move on.

From a Drudge link (here) I learned this film is Disney’s largest loss to date. Millions of dollars in disappointment short at the box office. Why? I don’t know. My son and I went in the middle of the day on a Wednesday and the theater, though not shoulder-to-shoulder, was quite nicely filled. I went for four reasons. First, my thirteen year old son asked to see it. Second, I wanted to see what Disney had spent so much money on only to call it a loss. Third, from the WND site’s review of the movie (here, which will link you back to the original post on Slate here), I wanted to see for myself the comparisons being drawn between John Carter and Jesus. Fourth and finally, I read the original Edgar Rice Burroughs series in high school and wanted to see it on the big screen.

I enjoyed it and recommend it but I can see a few similarities to other movies. If you haven’t seen the movie and don’t want me to ruin it, stop reading. Otherwise, please continue.

In the scenes where they’re paddling down the river, I was reminded of the original Planet of the Apes movie with a similar scene. I could also see a lot of Star Wars similarities, also. The flying machines reminded me of the Star Wars Episode VI when they were trying to throw Han and Luke into the Sarlacc. The large arena fight reminds me of another Star Wars battle scene, where the Jedi are being attacked en masse.

That’s it for now. See the movie if you haven’t yet and let me know what you think.